Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Chicken manure at 20 m3/fed. improved nitrogen content of inner edible cabbage leaves.

A claim from Response of Cabbage Plants (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. ) to Fertilization with Chicken Manure, Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Humic Acid · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chicken manure at 20 m3/fed. improved nitrogen content of inner edible cabbage leaves.

Treatment
20 m3/fed. of chicken manuree0
Outcome
N content of inner edible leavese0
Direction
more superiore0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of 20 m3/fed. of chicken manure showed more superior effect on vegetative growth characters (plant weight, non wrapper leaves weight and number, as well as total head yield and its component (net head weight, head length and diameter), and N content of inner edible leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 418–702
t0

“Cabbage Plants (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–65

Title

Response of Cabbage Plants (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. ) to Fertilization with Chicken Manure, Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Humic Acid

Gehan. A., El-Sharkawy,; Abdel-Razzak, H. S. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2010. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2010.2338

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-63df99aeca46c8ae635a3af03decc26516c7c718565c4af52fe724f1b669ca93 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

fertilization · nutrient: content · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Positive and negative results

146 papers: 127 positive, 19 negative or no effect

126 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

137 papers more in this group

See all 146 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.