Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Combined chicken manure and mineral nitrogen gave favorable cabbage weight and yield.

A claim from Response of Cabbage Plants (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. ) to Fertilization with Chicken Manure, Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Humic Acid · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined chicken manure and mineral nitrogen gave favorable cabbage weight and yield.

Treatment
20 m3/fed.) combined with the highest level of mineral N (120 kg N/fed.e0
Outcome
plant weight, net head weight and total head yielde0
Direction
beste0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica oleracea var. capitata
Brassica oleracea var. capitata · TaxonThamizhpparithi Maari · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of the highest rate of chicken manure (20 m3/fed.) combined with the highest level of mineral N (120 kg N/fed.) or humic acid (2 g/l) was found to be favorable for the cabbage to express their best performance on plant weight, net head weight and total head yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1138–1414
t0

“Cabbage Plants (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–65

Title

Response of Cabbage Plants (Brassica oleraceae var. capitata L. ) to Fertilization with Chicken Manure, Mineral Nitrogen Fertilizer and Humic Acid

Gehan. A., El-Sharkawy,; Abdel-Razzak, H. S. Alexandria Science Exchange Journal 2010. doi:10.21608/asejaiqjsae.2010.2338

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-d3eecc72e95be7550564e6c6c638ffcfb2fcd7294daddba03879e4282778d81a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · yield · Brassica oleracea (wild cabbage)Results differ

164 papers: 144 positive, 20 negative or no effect

143 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

155 papers more in this group

See all 164 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.