Claim · model-written summary
The negative interaction was most severe when 1-MCP followed QHWT and hydrocooling.
- Taxon
- Mango
_from_India.jpg?width=60)
Mangifera indicat0 - Treatment
- 1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocoolinge0
- Outcome
- negative interactione0
- Direction
- most severee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
_from_India.jpg?width=500)
Verbatim
e0“This negative interaction was less when 1-MCP was applied before QHWT, somewhat higher when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT, and most severe when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocooling.”
t0“Mango”
Title
Jorge A. Osuna-Garcia; Jeffrey K. Brecht; Donald J. Huber; et al. HortTechnology 2015. doi:10.21273/horttech.25.3.349
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Aqueous 1-MCP delayed mango fruit ripening, preserving firmness, attenuating flesh color development and delaying the TSS rise.
- Intervention effect Aqueous 1-MCP with QHWT caused surface spots and lenticel blackening during shipping and market simulations.
- Observation The negative interaction was least when 1-MCP preceded QHWT.
- Observation The negative interaction was higher when 1-MCP followed QHWT.
- Intervention effect Without QHWT, 1-MCP delayed ripening without affecting external appearance.
- Intervention effect Without QHWT, 1-MCP did not affect external appearance.
- Recommendation The authors suggest 1-MCP may be more useful for mango markets without mandatory QHWT.