Paper · 2015 · HortTechnology

Aqueous 1-Methylcyclopropene to Delay Ripening of ‘Kent’ Mango With or Without Quarantine Hot Water Treatment

Jorge A. Osuna-Garcia; Jeffrey K. Brecht; Donald J. Huber; et al.

8
claims
15
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Gaseous 1-methylcyclopropene (1-MCP) delays mango ( Mangifera indica ) fruit ripening, but requires 12 hours of application in sealed containers. In some fruit species, aqueous formulation applied as a postharvest dip for only 1 to 5 minutes has shown the same effectiveness as gaseous 1-MCP. This research was conducted to determine the effectiveness of aqueous 1-MCP on delay of the ripening process, extension of shelf life, and maintenance of fruit quality of ‘Kent’ mango fruit with or without quarantine hot water treatment (QHWT). Three experiments were conducted during the 2013 season in Mexico and Florida and during the 2014 season in Mexico. Aqueous 1-MCP caused delay of fruit ripening as shown by maintenance of fruit firmness, attenuation of flesh color development, and delayed increase of total soluble solids (TSS). However, it had a negative interaction with QHWT, causing surface spots and lenticel blackening to develop during shipping simulation [3 weeks at 12 ± 1 °C, 90% ± 5% relative humidity (RH)] and market simulation (7 days at 22 ± 2 °C, 75% ± 10% RH). This negative interaction was less when 1-MCP was applied before QHWT, somewhat higher when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT, and most severe when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocooling. By contrast, the ripening of fruit treated with 1-MCP without QHWT was delayed without affecting external appearance. Thus, 1-MCP may be more useful for mango markets that do not require mandatory QHWT.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous 1-MCP delayed mango fruit ripening, preserving firmness, attenuating flesh color development and delaying the TSS rise.

Treatment
Aqueous 1-MCPe0
Outcome
fruit ripeninge0
Direction
delaye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Aqueous 1-MCP caused delay of fruit ripening as shown by maintenance of fruit firmness, attenuation of flesh color development, and delayed increase of total soluble solids (TSS).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 654–833 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aqueous 1-MCP with QHWT caused surface spots and lenticel blackening during shipping and market simulations.

Treatment
QHWTe0
Outcome
surface spots and lenticel blackeninge0
Qualifier
shipping simulation [3 weeks at 12 ± 1 °C, 90% ± 5% relative humidity (RH)] and market simulation (7 days at 22 ± 2 °C, 75% ± 10% RH)e0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it had a negative interaction with QHWT, causing surface spots and lenticel blackening to develop during shipping simulation [3 weeks at 12 ± 1 °C, 90% ± 5% relative humidity (RH)] and market simulation (7 days at 22 ± 2 °C, 75% ± 10% RH).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 843–1082 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative interaction was least when 1-MCP preceded QHWT.

Treatment
1-MCP was applied before QHWTe0
Outcome
negative interactione0
Direction
lesse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This negative interaction was less when 1-MCP was applied before QHWT, somewhat higher when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT, and most severe when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocooling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative interaction was higher when 1-MCP followed QHWT.

Treatment
1-MCP was applied after QHWTe0
Outcome
negative interactione0
Direction
highere0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This negative interaction was less when 1-MCP was applied before QHWT, somewhat higher when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT, and most severe when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocooling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The negative interaction was most severe when 1-MCP followed QHWT and hydrocooling.

Treatment
1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocoolinge0
Outcome
negative interactione0
Direction
most severee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“This negative interaction was less when 1-MCP was applied before QHWT, somewhat higher when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT, and most severe when 1-MCP was applied after QHWT + hydrocooling.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1083–1270 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without QHWT, 1-MCP delayed ripening without affecting external appearance.

Treatment
1-MCP without QHWTe0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
delayede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ripening of fruit treated with 1-MCP without QHWT was delayed without affecting external appearance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Without QHWT, 1-MCP did not affect external appearance.

Treatment
1-MCP without QHWTe0
Outcome
external appearancee0
Direction
without affectinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the ripening of fruit treated with 1-MCP without QHWT was delayed without affecting external appearance.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1388 · show in text ↑
t0

“Mango”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest 1-MCP may be more useful for mango markets without mandatory QHWT.

Outcome
1-MCP may be more useful for mango markets that do not require mandatory QHWTe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Mangifera indica
Mangifera indica · TaxonBilljones94 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“1-MCP may be more useful for mango markets that do not require mandatory QHWT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1395–1473 · show in text ↑

1-methylcyclopropene · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

heat · quality: postharvest · Mangifera indica (mango)Results differ

40 papers: 33 positive, 7 negative or no effect

32 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.