Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Ridge tillage significantly increased soybean root nitrogen absorption until flowering.

A claim from N2fixation of nodules and N absorption by soybean roots associated with ridge tillage on poorly drained upland fields converted from rice paddy fields · 2006

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ridge tillage significantly increased soybean root nitrogen absorption until flowering.

Taxon
soybeanGlycine maxt0
Organ / stage
R1 (flowering stage)e0
Treatment
RTe0
Outcome
N absorption by rootse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Glycine max
Glycine max · TaxonPublic domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“RT significantly increased the activities of both N2 fixation of nodules and N absorption by roots until R1 (flowering stage).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 919–1045
t0

“soybean”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–49

Title

N2fixation of nodules and N absorption by soybean roots associated with ridge tillage on poorly drained upland fields converted from rice paddy fields

Tomoki Takahashi; Hisashi Hosokawa; Morio Matsuzaki Soil Science & Plant Nutrition 2006. doi:10.1111/j.1747-0765.2006.00037.x

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-64d83dee96a61985c4a3eea26194e7db743ea9f53b77dcdc3c73043cfa3bb2fb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · nutrient: content · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 21 positive, 6 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.