Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Red clover dry matter yields followed the increasing seed rate trend.

A claim from The influence of date of sowing and seed rate on the production of pure‐sown red clover · 1976

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Red clover dry matter yields followed the increasing seed rate trend.

Taxon
Red cloverTrifolium pratensee0
Treatment
seed ratet0
Outcome
dry matter yieldse0
Direction
increaseinferrede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Red clover dry matter yields and contents of red clover and crude protein in the total herbage also followed this trend”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–988
t0

“The influence of date of sowing and seed rate on the production of pure‐sown red clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87
t1

“August and September sowings gave the lowest red clover contents in a range from 63.2 to 96.5%, the highest digestibilities within a range 61.9 to 65.0% and the lowest crude protein contents in a range 15.5 to 17.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–672

Title

The influence of date of sowing and seed rate on the production of pure‐sown red clover

J. FRAME; R. D. HARKESS; I. V. HUNT Grass and Forage Science 1976. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1976.tb00783.x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-65e1f70fedd84f2054cd18c1882efc58f720e4739b323019636553c027c91477 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

density · yield · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 3 positive, 4 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
See all 7 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.