Intervention effectmodel-written summary

April to July sowing produced significantly higher yields than later sowing.

A claim from The influence of date of sowing and seed rate on the production of pure‐sown red clover · 1976

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

April to July sowing produced significantly higher yields than later sowing.

Taxon
red cloverTrifolium pratenset0
Treatment
April to July sowing datese0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
later sowingse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Trifolium pratense
Trifolium pratense · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“April to July sowing dates gave significantly higher yields than later sowings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 364–442
t0

“The influence of date of sowing and seed rate on the production of pure‐sown red clover”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–87
t1

“August and September sowings gave the lowest red clover contents in a range from 63.2 to 96.5%, the highest digestibilities within a range 61.9 to 65.0% and the lowest crude protein contents in a range 15.5 to 17.3%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 456–672

Title

The influence of date of sowing and seed rate on the production of pure‐sown red clover

J. FRAME; R. D. HARKESS; I. V. HUNT Grass and Forage Science 1976. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2494.1976.tb00783.x

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-8ab45757d876595808520dcfbbe755e39971fc04f2b0d23433317aabee228571 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

sowing time · yield · Trifolium pratense (red clover)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 1 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
See all 3 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.