Claim · model-written summary
Irrigation postponed to middle grain filling was unfavorable to yield.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- irrigation postponed at middle grain filling stagee0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- unfavorablee0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the irrigation postponed at middle grain filling stage was unfavorable to yield”
t0“Wheat”
Title
Effects of Irrigation Stages on Quality and Yield in Strong Gluten Wheat
Zhao GuangCai Mailei zuowu xuebao 2012
Other claims from this paper (10)
- Association Main-stem crude protein content decreased as irrigation was delayed.
- Association Main-tiller crude protein content followed the same decreasing trend with delayed irrigation.
- Observation Crude protein content was higher in the main tillers than the main stem.
- Intervention effect Irrigation before the fourth spring leaf increased panicle number.
- Intervention effect Irrigation from the fifth spring leaf to booting increased grain number per spike.
- Intervention effect Irrigation from booting to grain filling improved thousand-grain weight.
- Association Grain yield rose with delayed irrigation stages.
- Intervention effect Irrigation after middle filling did not benefit grain yield.
- Intervention effect Irrigation after grain filling reduced sedimentation value.
- Intervention effect Irrigation after grain filling decreased dry and wet gluten content.