Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Sewage sludge fertilization gave castor bean seed yields of 2.56 to 3.02 t/ha, higher than unfertilized soil.

A claim from Productivity and nutrition of castor bean fertilized with sewage sludge stabilized by different processes · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sewage sludge fertilization gave castor bean seed yields of 2.56 to 3.02 t/ha, higher than unfertilized soil.

Taxon
castor beanRicinus communise0
Treatment
fertilization with SSe0
Outcome
seed yieldse0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.56 to 3.02 t ha-1e0
Comparator
unfertilized soile0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Ricinus communis
Ricinus communis · TaxonDvellakat · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Regardless of the stabilization process, fertilization with SS generated castor bean seed yields ranging from 2.56 to 3.02 t ha-1, similar to that with mineral fertilization and higher than that of unfertilized soil”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1002–1217

Title

Productivity and nutrition of castor bean fertilized with sewage sludge stabilized by different processes

Altina Lacerda Nascimento; Maria Clara Oliveira Durães; Regynaldo Arruda Sampaio; et al. Research Society and Development 2022. doi:10.33448/rsd-v11i10.32275

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6693aebbc91c9c8ee6ceb3128e5ec86593029d656f11125faa4b44ea7ed8414e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

organic · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · yield · Ricinus communis (castor bean)Positive and negative results

43 papers: 40 positive, 3 negative or no effect

39 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

34 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.