Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that deep tillage performed better than shallow and medium deep tillage in terms of yield and yield components.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- deep tillagee1
- Outcome
- yield and yield componentse1
- Direction
- performed bettere1
- Comparator
- shallow and medium deep tillage practicese1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
t0“chickpea”
e1“deep tillage performed better as compared with shallow and medium deep tillage practices in terms of yield and yield components”
Title
Abrar Ahmad Pure and Applied Biology 2019. doi:10.19045/bspab.2019.80052
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected weed density, 438 m-2 under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected weeds dry weight (6.4 g m-2) and weeds fresh weight (13.5 g m-2) under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected nodules weight, 1.15 g plant-1 under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected plant height, 83.3 cm under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected number of branches per plant (11) and days to maturity (196) under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected grain yield, 1447 kg ha-1 under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice significantly affected biological yield (4155 kg ha-1) and harvest index (37.5 %) under deep tillage.
- Intervention effect Tillage practice did not significantly affect days to emergence, emergence m-2, days to 50% flowering, number of nodules, pods per plant, grains per pod or pods m-2.
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on days to maturity (196).
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on number of nodules, 16.0 plant-1.
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on nodules weight, 1.10 g plant-1.
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on plant height, 81.3 cm.
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on number of pods per plant (33.5) and pods m-2 (837).
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on 100 grain weight, 25.3 g.
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on grain yield, 1483 kg ha-1.
- Intervention effect Potassium had a significant impact on biological yield (4244 kg ha-1) and harvest index (37.6 %).
- Intervention effect Potassium did not significantly affect days to emergence, emergence m-2, weed density, weeds dry and fresh weight, branches per plant or days to 50% flowering.
- Intervention effect The tillage by potassium interaction was significant only for 50 % flowering and non-significant for the other parameters.
- Recommendation The authors conclude that potassium at 60 kg ha-1 improved growth and productivity in the Peshawar region.