Claim · model-written summary
Water economic productivity was higher in conventional flat planting than in raised-bed planting
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Treatment
- CFPe5
- Outcome
- Water economic productivity (WEP)e5
- Direction
- higherinferrede5
- Value
- 0.171 $ m−3e5
- Qualifier
- 0.151 $ m−3e5
- Comparator
- RBPe5
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“for wheat”
e5“Water economic productivity (WEP) was 0.171 $ m−3 in the CFP compared to 0.151 $ m−3 in the RBP”
Title
Oner Cetin; Cuma Akinci International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2021. doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1999682
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect The highest wheat grain yield, 4.61 t ha−1, was obtained with conventional flat planting and basin irrigation
- Observation Irrigation water productivity was 1.31 and 1.60 kg m−3 for CFP and RBP, respectively
- Intervention effect Drip irrigation gave higher irrigation water productivity than surface irrigation
- Intervention effect The highest net income, 828 $ ha−1, was obtained with conventional flat planting and basin irrigation
- Intervention effect The second highest net income, 749 $ ha−1, was obtained with raised-bed planting and furrow irrigation
- Intervention effect Surface irrigation gave more water economic productivity than drip irrigation
- Recommendation Drip irrigation and raised-bed planting are not feasible in the study region
- Association All data were much higher in the wet season