Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigation and raised-bed planting are not feasible in the study region
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivumt0 - Outcome
- DI and RBP were not feasible in the study regione7
- Setting
- study regione7
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“for wheat”
e7“Thus DI and RBP were not feasible in the study region”
Title
Oner Cetin; Cuma Akinci International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 2021. doi:10.1080/14735903.2021.1999682
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect The highest wheat grain yield, 4.61 t ha−1, was obtained with conventional flat planting and basin irrigation
- Observation Irrigation water productivity was 1.31 and 1.60 kg m−3 for CFP and RBP, respectively
- Intervention effect Drip irrigation gave higher irrigation water productivity than surface irrigation
- Intervention effect The highest net income, 828 $ ha−1, was obtained with conventional flat planting and basin irrigation
- Intervention effect The second highest net income, 749 $ ha−1, was obtained with raised-bed planting and furrow irrigation
- Intervention effect Water economic productivity was higher in conventional flat planting than in raised-bed planting
- Intervention effect Surface irrigation gave more water economic productivity than drip irrigation
- Association All data were much higher in the wet season