Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Low nitrogen increased individual crown root length by 63%.

A claim from Novel temporal, fine‐scale and growth variation phenotypes in roots of adult‐stage maize (Zea mays L.) in response to low nitrogen stress · 2011

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Low nitrogen increased individual crown root length by 63%.

Taxon
maize (Zea mays L.)Zea mayst0
Treatment
low nitrogen stresst0
Outcome
lengths of individual crown roots (CRs)e0
Direction
increasinge0
Value
63%e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“30-day-old plants responded by increasing lengths of individual crown roots (CRs) by 63%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 439–527
t0

“maize (Zea mays L.) in response to low nitrogen stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 83–137

Title

Novel temporal, fine‐scale and growth variation phenotypes in roots of adult‐stage maize (Zea mays L.) in response to low nitrogen stress

AMELIE C. M. GAUDIN; SARAH A. MCCLYMONT; BRIDGET M. HOLMES; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2011. doi:10.1111/j.1365-3040.2011.02409.x

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-69bb289a00aefa817cf82210e933a5cc811234d696f4e7b5c6fb4edc12a424ca · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

nitrogen · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 95 positive, 47 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this claim · 43 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. no effect

133 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.