Claim · model-written summary
No-tillage yield was 59.6 kg·ha-1 less than normal tillage, a difference that was not significant.
- Taxon
- Summer Soybean
Glycine maxt0 - Treatment
- no-tillagee6
- Outcome
- Yielde6
- Direction
- less thane6
- Value
- 59.6 kg·ha-1e6
- Comparator
- normal tillagee6
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Summer Soybean to No-tillage and Normal Tillage”
e6“Yield of no-tillage was less than the normal tillage by 59.6 kg·ha-1,but the difference was not significant”
Title
Fahong Wang Dadou kexue 2010
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Intervention effect No-tillage reduced average soil water content at 0～20 cm compared with normal tillage by 1.06%, a difference that was not significant.
- Intervention effect No-tillage soil water content at 20～40 cm was 0.36% higher than normal tillage, not significant.
- Intervention effect No-tillage soil water content at 40～60 cm was 0.96% higher than normal tillage, not significant.
- Intervention effect No-tillage soil water content at 60～80 cm was 0.97% higher than normal tillage, not significant.
- Intervention effect No-tillage did not significantly change agronomic characters such as growth period and 100-seed weight of summer soybean.
- Observation In the peak water requirement period, soil water content could meet the needs of soybean growth.
- Observation Average yield was 4253.6 and 4313.2 kg·ha-1 for no-tillage and normal tillage, respectively.
- Recommendation No-tillage crop could be recommended for popularization, saving labor and preventing soil erosion while protecting soil structure.