Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Fe did not affect quality, root strength, SOD, or photochemical efficiency.

A claim from Trinexapac-ethyl, Propiconazole, Iron, and Biostimulant Effects on Shaded Creeping Bentgrass · 2004

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fe did not affect quality, root strength, SOD, or photochemical efficiency.

Taxon
Creeping bentgrassAgrostis stoloniferae1
Treatment
Fee0
Outcome
quality, root strength, SOD, or photochemical efficiencye0
Direction
did not have an effecte0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Agrostis stolonifera
Agrostis stolonifera · TaxonAlfred · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Treatment with Fe, CPR, or SWE+HA did not have an effect on quality, root strength, SOD, or photochemical efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1785–1901
e1

“Creeping bentgrass ( Agrostis stolonifera )”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–43

Title

Trinexapac-ethyl, Propiconazole, Iron, and Biostimulant Effects on Shaded Creeping Bentgrass

E.H. Ervin; Xunzhong Zhang; J.M. Goatley; et al. HortTechnology 2004. doi:10.21273/horttech.14.4.0500

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-6bb922a71ff7fdbd515d30534113d0f2c347b3a9e192135f3e263227bb5e6f2a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 10 in the model’s answer

iron atom · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Agrostis stolonifera (creeping bent grass)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.