Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Hand weeding increased rice dry matter production significantly.

A claim from Influence of integrated weed management practices on growth parameters, yield attributes of machine transplanted rice crop · 2020

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Hand weeding increased rice dry matter production significantly.

Taxon
rice cropOryza sativat0
Treatment
Hand weeding at 20, 40 DATe0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hand weeding at 20, 40 DAT recorded significantly higher growth parameters like plant height, tillers, leaf area index, dry matter production and was at par with penoxsulam 1.02% W/W + cyhalofop-p-butyl 5.1% W/W @ 153 g ha-1 at 2-3 leaf stage of weeds + power weeder at 30-40 DAT.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 430–710
t0

“rice crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 113–122

Title

Influence of integrated weed management practices on growth parameters, yield attributes of machine transplanted rice crop

B Raviteja; KP Vani; M Yakadri; et al. International Journal of Chemical Studies 2020. doi:10.22271/chemi.2020.v8.i5i.10370

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-6ddd0fbe3e21b68f409a528efc0d336062131f2641f761b821b7af22fbc00c06 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

herbicide · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

802 papers: 725 positive, 77 negative or no effect

724 papers in the same direction as this claim · 57 in the opposite direction · 20 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. negative

793 papers more in this group

See all 802 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.