Claim · model-written summary
Compound 4d had an in vitro EC50 of 0.95 mg/L against Botrytis cinerea.
- Taxon
- Botrytis cinerea
Botrytis cinereae1 - Outcome
- EC 50 valuese0
- Value
- 0.95e0
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“EC 50 values of 0.21, 0.95, 0.64, 1.33, and 0.66 mg L”
e1“against Valsa mali , Botrytis cinerea , Rhizoctonia solani , Fusarium graminearum , and Gaeumannomyces graminis”
Title
Yantao Li; Yuxin Mu; Jun Xiong; et al. Pest Management Science 2025. doi:10.1002/ps.8943
Other claims from this paper (9)
- Observation Compound 4d had an in vitro EC50 of 0.21 mg/L against Valsa mali.
- Observation Compound 4d had an in vitro EC50 of 0.64 mg/L against Rhizoctonia solani.
- Observation Compound 4d had an in vitro EC50 of 1.33 mg/L against Fusarium graminearum.
- Observation Compound 4d had an in vitro EC50 of 0.66 mg/L against Gaeumannomyces graminis.
- Intervention effect Compound 4d gave a protective effect of 93.4% against V. mali infection in apples, versus 68.7% for lead compound A27.
- Intervention effect Compound 4d gave a curative effect of 85.5% against V. mali infection in apples, versus 57.0% for lead compound A27.
- Intervention effect Compound 4d gave a protective effect of 93.4% against V. mali infection in apples, versus 55.4% for fluxapyroxad.
- Intervention effect Compound 4d gave a curative effect of 85.5% against V. mali infection in apples, versus 43.6% for fluxapyroxad.
- Mechanism Enzymatic inhibition assays and molecular docking suggested that compound 4d could serve as a potential SDH inhibitor.