Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Inoculation with halotolerant bacteria increased canola root length by 5.2% to 47.8% under 150 mM NaCl salt stress.

A claim from Isolation, Characterization, and Use for Plant Growth Promotion Under Salt Stress, of ACC Deaminase-Producing Halotolerant Bacteria Derived from Coastal Soil · 2010

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Inoculation with halotolerant bacteria increased canola root length by 5.2% to 47.8% under 150 mM NaCl salt stress.

Treatment
Inoculation of the 14 halotolerant bacterial strainse0
Interactor
halotolerant bacterial strainse0symbiont
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
5.2% and 47.8%e0
Qualifier
150 mM NaCle0
Comparator
uninoculated positive controlse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Brassica napus var. napus
Brassica napus var. napus · Taxoncontri from Yonezawa-Shi, Yamagata, Japan · CC BY-SA 2.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Inoculation of the 14 halotolerant bacterial strains to ameliorate salt stress (150 mM NaCl) in canola plants produced an increase in root length of between 5.2% and 47.8%, and dry weight of between 16.2% and 43%, in comparison with the uninoculated positive controls”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1307–1574

Title

Isolation, Characterization, and Use for Plant Growth Promotion Under Salt Stress, of ACC Deaminase-Producing Halotolerant Bacteria Derived from Coastal Soil

Md. Ashaduzzaman Siddikee; Puneet. S. Chauhan; R. Anandham; et al. Journal of Microbiology and Biotechnology 2010. doi:10.4014/jmb.1007.07011

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-6e82b7a2c8ce99585f28687fbab3d9b1dfefc914f97238fc724172d4e84d63ae · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

inoculation · growth · Brassica napus (oilseed rape)Positive and negative results

74 papers: 61 positive, 13 negative or no effect

60 papers in the same direction as this claim · 13 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. no effect
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

65 papers more in this group

See all 74 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.