Claim · model-written summary
With no weed pressure, no herbicide treatment changed peanut yield relative to the untreated check.
- Taxon
- peanut
Arachis hypogaeat0 - Treatment
- any herbicide treatmente4
- Outcome
- yielde4
- Direction
- no differencese4
- Qualifier
- no weed pressuree4
- Comparator
- untreated checke4
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValue
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Controlling Weeds in Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.)”
e4“Under moderate A. palmeri pressure (4 to 5 plants/m2), all herbicide systems increased peanut yield over the untreated check (65%), while with no weed pressure, no differences in yield were noted with any herbicide treatment from the untreated check”
Title
W. James Grichar; Emi Kimura Journal of Experimental Agriculture International 2026. doi:10.9734/jeai/2026/v48i24043
Other claims from this paper (8)
- Observation In south Texas, Palmer amaranth control was above 90% with several herbicide systems.
- Observation All herbicide systems containing C + P controlled Texas millet (Urochloa texana) by 87 to 98%.
- Observation C + P systems controlled Smellmelon by 58 to 100%.
- Observation In the Rolling Plains, control of Amaranthus palmeri and Urochloa texana was 76 to 91% with C + P applied both at CRACK and POST.
- Intervention effect Under moderate Palmer amaranth pressure, all herbicide systems increased peanut yield over the untreated check by 65%.
- Recommendation The premix of C + P can help peanut producers manage annual broadleaf weed problems (author recommendation).
- Observation C + P often does not effectively control large-seeded annual grasses such as Texas millet.
- Recommendation C + P needs a graminicide to improve season-long control of large-seeded grasses (author recommendation).