Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Zinc, boron and poultry manure significantly increased garlic growth and bulb traits in both years.

A claim from Response of garlic to zinc, boron and poultry manure application · 1970

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc, boron and poultry manure significantly increased garlic growth and bulb traits in both years.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
zinc, boron, and poultry manuree0
Outcome
plant height, number of leaves/plant, cloves/bulbe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of zinc, boron, and poultry manure significantly had increased plant height, number of leaves/plant, cloves/bulb, diameter, and weight of bulb and yield/ha in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 350–532
t0

“garlic”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–18

Title

Response of garlic to zinc, boron and poultry manure application

S Nasreen; MN Yousuf; ANM Mamun; et al. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Research 1970. doi:10.3329/bjar.v34i2.5795

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-6eebd92fac84cd993b0aa89ad4763b989ba5b0c8f8c1671f65b97082b0c79727 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

boron atom · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this claim · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. positive

90 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.