Intervention effectmodel-written summary

CCC plus GA3 increased lodging rate.

A claim from Optimising the Morphology and Quality of Basal Stem Nodes to Improve Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC plus GA3 increased lodging rate.

Treatment
exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatmentse1
Outcome
lodging ratee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a decrease in cellulose and hemicellulose content, thereby increasing lodging rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1470
e1

“exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1205
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103

Title

Optimising the Morphology and Quality of Basal Stem Nodes to Improve Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield

J. C. Zhang; Y. Q. Zhang; Q. J. Xu; et al. Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science 2025. doi:10.1111/jac.70118

Other claims from this paper (17)

Record rev-6ef5ebdf5a14f33da1512f103e670d273251f0bf2a3755717494faacd85454be · schema claims-v0.9 · position 11 in the model’s answer

chlormequat chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

49 papers: 37 positive, 12 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
    Only trinexapac-ethyl and chlormequat reduced wheat plant height, relative to the control without retardant.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009 · compared with control treatment without growth retardant application

    Opposite direction

  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 54 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

58 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.