Paper · 2025 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Optimising the Morphology and Quality of Basal Stem Nodes to Improve Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield

J. C. Zhang; Y. Q. Zhang; Q. J. Xu; et al.

18
claims
45
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

ABSTRACT Lodging is one of the main limiting factors threatening crop yields. Although the technology to modify plant morphology and improve lodging resistance using plant growth regulators (PGRs) is well developed, the understanding of the effects and underlying mechanisms of PGRs in regulating stem traits at different growth stages of wheat remains limited. In this study, two cultivars, Shidong 0358 (SD0358, a lodging resistant cultivar) and Xindong 18 (XD18, a lodging‐sensitive cultivar), were used to investigate the effects of chlorocholine chloride (CCC) and gibberellin (GA 3 ) treatment on wheat stem characteristics, lodging resistance, lignin and cellulose biosynthesis processes and yield during the jointing and booting stages. The results showed that in the lodging‐sensitive cultivar (XD18), exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages shortened the second basal internode during the flowering and filling stages, while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index, resulting in a decrease in wheat lodging rate and an increase in total yield, compared with CK. However, exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments during the jointing and booting stages increased the height of the gravity centre of wheat, reduced the activity of 4‐Coumaroyl‐CoA and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase, resulting in a decrease in cellulose and hemicellulose content, thereby increasing lodging rate. Meanwhile, under CC treatment, the lodging‐resistant cultivar (SD0358) showed enhanced stem breakage strength and enhanced yield with advantageous lignin biosynthesis ability. Interestingly, compared to CC, CG treatment showed an increase in cellulose and hemicellulose content in the stem of SD0358 and a further increase in final yield. Overall, the application of CCC during the jointing and booting stages improved stem morphology and quality, thereby enhancing lodging resistance and final grain yield, especially in lodging‐sensitive cultivars. The combined strategy of applying CCC during the jointing stage and GA 3 during the booting stage is an effective chemical regulation method to balance lodging resistance and yield potential in lodging‐resistant cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 18

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC shortened the second basal internode of XD18.

Organ / stage
flowering and filling stagese0
Treatment
exogenous CCC treatment (CC)e0
Outcome
second basal internodee0
Direction
shortenede0

Not reportedMaterialComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages shortened the second basal internode during the flowering and filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased lignin and hemicellulose content in XD18.

Treatment
exogenous CCC treatment (CC)e1
Outcome
lignin and hemicellulose contente0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages shortened the second basal internode during the flowering and filling stages, while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased XD18 stem breakage strength.

Treatment
exogenous CCC treatment (CC)e1
Outcome
stem breakage strengthe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages shortened the second basal internode during the flowering and filling stages, while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased XD18 stem lodging resistance index.

Treatment
exogenous CCC treatment (CC)e1
Outcome
stem lodging resistance indexe0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 953–1060 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages shortened the second basal internode during the flowering and filling stages, while increasing lignin and hemicellulose content, stem breakage strength and stem lodging resistance index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–1060 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC reduced XD18 lodging rate versus CK.

Treatment
exogenous CCC treatment (CC)e1
Outcome
wheat lodging ratee0
Direction
decreasee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a decrease in wheat lodging rate and an increase in total yield, compared with CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC increased XD18 total yield versus CK.

Treatment
exogenous CCC treatment (CC)e1
Outcome
total yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a decrease in wheat lodging rate and an increase in total yield, compared with CK.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1062–1157 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC treatment (CC) at the jointing and booting stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 811–874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC plus GA3 increased wheat gravity-centre height.

Treatment
exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatmentse0
Outcome
height of the gravity centree0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments during the jointing and booting stages increased the height of the gravity centre of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1296 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC plus GA3 reduced 4-Coumaroyl-CoA activity.

Treatment
exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatmentse1
Outcome
activity of 4‐Coumaroyl‐CoAe0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the activity of 4‐Coumaroyl‐CoA and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1372 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments during the jointing and booting stages increased the height of the gravity centre of wheat, reduced the activity of 4‐Coumaroyl‐CoA and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC plus GA3 reduced Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase activity.

Treatment
exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatmentse1
Outcome
Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenasee0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“reduced the activity of 4‐Coumaroyl‐CoA and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1298–1372 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments during the jointing and booting stages increased the height of the gravity centre of wheat, reduced the activity of 4‐Coumaroyl‐CoA and Cinnamyl Alcohol Dehydrogenase”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1372 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC plus GA3 reduced cellulose and hemicellulose content.

Treatment
exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatmentse1
Outcome
cellulose and hemicellulose contente0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a decrease in cellulose and hemicellulose content, thereby increasing lodging rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC plus GA3 increased lodging rate.

Treatment
exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatmentse1
Outcome
lodging ratee0
Direction
increasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“resulting in a decrease in cellulose and hemicellulose content, thereby increasing lodging rate.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1374–1470 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous CCC and GA 3 (CG) treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1167–1205 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC enhanced stem breakage strength in SD0358.

Material
SD0358e0
Treatment
CC treatmente0
Outcome
stem breakage strengthe0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under CC treatment, the lodging‐resistant cultivar (SD0358) showed enhanced stem breakage strength and enhanced yield with advantageous lignin biosynthesis ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC enhanced yield in SD0358.

Material
SD0358e0
Treatment
CC treatmente0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under CC treatment, the lodging‐resistant cultivar (SD0358) showed enhanced stem breakage strength and enhanced yield with advantageous lignin biosynthesis ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SD0358 showed advantageous lignin biosynthesis under CCC.

Material
SD0358e0
Treatment
CC treatmente0
Outcome
advantageous lignin biosynthesis abilitye0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“under CC treatment, the lodging‐resistant cultivar (SD0358) showed enhanced stem breakage strength and enhanced yield with advantageous lignin biosynthesis ability.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1646 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CG increased SD0358 stem cellulose and hemicellulose relative to CC.

Material
SD0358e0
Treatment
CG treatmente0
Outcome
cellulose and hemicellulose contente0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to CC, CG treatment showed an increase in cellulose and hemicellulose content in the stem of SD0358”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1770 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CG further increased final yield in SD0358 relative to CC.

Material
SD0358e0
Treatment
CG treatmente0
Outcome
final yielde0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
CCe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“compared to CC, CG treatment showed an increase in cellulose and hemicellulose content in the stem of SD0358 and a further increase in final yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1662–1809 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend CCC at jointing and booting to improve lodging resistance and grain yield, especially in sensitive cultivars.

Outcome
application of CCC during the jointing and booting stagese0
Qualifier
especially in lodging‐sensitive cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of CCC during the jointing and booting stages improved stem morphology and quality, thereby enhancing lodging resistance and final grain yield, especially in lodging‐sensitive cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1819–2021 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Authors recommend CCC at jointing with GA3 at booting to balance lodging resistance and yield in resistant cultivars.

Outcome
combined strategy of applying CCC during the jointing stage and GA 3 during the booting stagee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The combined strategy of applying CCC during the jointing stage and GA 3 during the booting stage is an effective chemical regulation method to balance lodging resistance and yield potential in lodging‐resistant cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2022–2244 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Lodging Resistance and Yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–103 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 30 positive, 5 negative or no effect

29 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

chlormequat chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

49 papers: 37 positive, 12 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

45 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

Gibberellic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

67 papers: 54 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

63 papers more in this group

See all 67 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

chlormequat chloride · disease · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 4 positive, 3 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

Gibberellic acid · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 10 positive, 3 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

chlormequat chloride · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.