Paper · 1986 · Crop Science

Response of Five Winter Wheat Cultivars to Growth Regulators and Increased Nitrogen1

Emerson D. Nafziger; Loyd M. Wax; C. M. Brown

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
44
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Plant growth regulators (PGRs) are widely used in Europe for lodging control in winter wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) grown at high N rates. A 2‐yr experiment was conducted in Illinois to evaluate the effects of three PGRs on grain yield, plant height, and lodging in five cultivars of soft red winter wheat grown at normal and high N rates. Increasing the N rate from 84 to 168 kg ha −1 decreased average yield by 12%. Mefluidide { N ‐[2,4‐Dimethyl‐5‐[[(trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl]amino]phenyl]acetamide} at 0.03 kg ha −1 applied at Feekes‐Large growth stage 5 decreased yield by 43%. But CCC 1(2‐chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride] at 3.37 kg ha −1 applied at growth stage 5 did not affect yields, and ethephon [(2‐Chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] applied at growth stage 9 had no effect on yield when applied at 0.28 kg ha −1 , but decreased yield 6% when applied at 0.56 kg ha −1 . A significant cultivar ✕ treatment interaction resulted from differential cultivar sensitivity to mefluidide injury and to yield reduction caused by ethephon. While most PGR treatments were quite effective in decreasing plant height and lodging, these favorable results must be weighed against occasional yield decreases, especially when used on certain cultivars and under less favorable conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Doubling nitrogen decreased wheat yield by 12%.

Taxon
Winter WheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Increasing the N rate from 84 to 168 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
average yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
12%e0
Comparator
84e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing the N rate from 84 to 168 kg ha −1 decreased average yield by 12%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 341–417 · show in text ↑
t0

“Winter Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Mefluidide at growth stage 5 decreased yield by 43%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
Feekes‐Large growth stage 5e0
Treatment
Mefluidide { N ‐[2,4‐Dimethyl‐5‐[[(trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl]amino]phenyl]acetamide} at 0.03 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
43%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mefluidide { N ‐[2,4‐Dimethyl‐5‐[[(trifluoromethyl) sulfonyl]amino]phenyl]acetamide} at 0.03 kg ha −1 applied at Feekes‐Large growth stage 5 decreased yield by 43%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 419–582 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CCC did not affect yield.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
growth stage 5e0
Treatment
CCC 1(2‐chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride] at 3.37 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
yieldse0
Direction
did not affecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“CCC 1(2‐chloroethyl) trimethylammonium chloride] at 3.37 kg ha −1 applied at growth stage 5 did not affect yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 588–701 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 0.28 kg ha −1 had no yield effect.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ethephon [(2‐Chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] applied at growth stage 9e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
had no effecte0
Value
0.28 kg ha −1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethephon [(2‐Chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] applied at growth stage 9 had no effect on yield when applied at 0.28 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 707–828 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon at 0.56 kg ha −1 decreased yield by 6%.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
0.56 kg ha −1e0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
6%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased yield 6% when applied at 0.56 kg ha −1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 835–883 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivars differed significantly in sensitivity to mefluidide injury and ethephon yield reduction.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Material
cultivare0
Outcome
cultivar sensitivity to mefluidide injury and to yield reduction caused by ethephone0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A significant cultivar ✕ treatment interaction resulted from differential cultivar sensitivity to mefluidide injury and to yield reduction caused by ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 886–1043 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Most growth regulator treatments reduced height and lodging.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
PGR treatmentse0
Outcome
plant height and lodginge0
Direction
decreasinge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most PGR treatments were quite effective in decreasing plant height and lodging”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1130 · show in text ↑
t0

“winter wheat”

✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 17–29 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 53 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

primary amino group · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

stage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 95 positive, 65 negative or no effect

64 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2,061 papers: 1,737 positive, 324 negative or no effect

323 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1,737 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2,057 papers more in this group

See all 2,061 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.