Paper · 1994 · Journal of Agronomy and Crop Science

Plant Growth Regulator Effects on Protein Content and Yield of Spring Barley and Wheat

B. L. Ma; S. Leibovitch; D. L. Smith

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Plant growth regulators (PGR) have potential to increase grain yield and may also alter grain protein levels of cereal crops. A 3‐yr field experiment with spring barley ( Hordeum vulgare L.) and wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars was conducted to determine whether ethephon treatment increased protein concentration, protein yield, and grain yield. A greenhouse experiment was also conducted to evaluate the response of barley grain protein concentration to gradual addition of ethephon (2.2 × 10 ‐3 mM) or chlormequat (5.8 × 10 ‐3 mM) solution after an thesis. Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur. For Laurier barley, total gram N content was increased by up to 20 % in one year of this study. However, over the 3 years, an inverse relation existed between grain protein and yield. Greenhouse data showed that i) the gradient in grain size and protein concentration among spikelets of a spike, which is established before anthesis, was not affected by either chlormequat or ethephon; and ii) chlormequat increased grain protein by 7 to 11 % whereas ethephon increased protein concentration by up to 13 % in one of the two experiments. Our data indicate that PGR can alter protein accumulation in the grain, and thus, the quality of bread wheat and feed barley crops can be increased m regions with a short crop‐growing season. However, a portion of the increase in gram protein concentration is due to decreased starch deposition, which is associated with yield reductions. The greenhouse data confirmed that a portion of the increase in grain protein concentration due to PGR application is caused by increased protein accumulation in the barley grain.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased barley grain protein concentration by up to 16% in the field.

Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
grain protein concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16 %e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased wheat grain protein concentration by up to 16% in the field.

Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
grain protein concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0
Value
16 %e0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon decreased barley grain yield in the field.

Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon decreased wheat grain yield in the field.

Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
decreasede0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon produced small or absent protein yield increases in barley.

Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
increases were small or did not occure0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon produced small or absent protein yield increases in wheat.

Treatment
ethephon treatmente0
Outcome
protein yielde0
Direction
increases were small or did not occure0
Setting
field conditionse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“Under field conditions, ethephon treatment increased barley and wheat grain protein concentrations by as much as 16 % but decreased grain yield so that protein yield increases were small or did not occur.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 576–780 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Laurier barley grain nitrogen content increased by up to 20% in one year.

Material
Lauriere0
Outcome
total gram N contente0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20 %e0
Qualifier
in one year of this studye0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“For Laurier barley, total gram N content was increased by up to 20 % in one year of this study.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–876 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmixedmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain protein and yield had an inverse relation across three years.

Taxon
Spring Barley and WheatHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
graine0
Outcome
grain protein and yielde0
Direction
inverse relatione0
Qualifier
over the 3 yearse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“However, over the 3 years, an inverse relation existed between grain protein and yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–964 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The chlormequat treatment did not affect the preanthesis gradient in grain size and protein among barley spikelets.

Treatment
chlormequate0
Outcome
gradient in grain size and protein concentration among spikelets of a spikee0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
established before anthesise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“the gradient in grain size and protein concentration among spikelets of a spike, which is established before anthesis, was not affected by either chlormequat or ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The ethephon treatment did not affect the preanthesis gradient in grain size and protein among barley spikelets.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
gradient in grain size and protein concentration among spikelets of a spikee0
Direction
not affectede0
Qualifier
established before anthesise0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–76 · show in text ↑
e0

“the gradient in grain size and protein concentration among spikelets of a spike, which is established before anthesis, was not affected by either chlormequat or ethephon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 996–1165 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chlormequat increased barley grain protein by 7 to 11% in a greenhouse experiment.

Treatment
chlormequate0
Outcome
grain proteine0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7 to 11 %e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“chlormequat increased grain protein by 7 to 11 % whereas ethephon increased protein concentration by up to 13 % in one of the two experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1317 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon increased barley grain protein concentration by up to 13% in one of two greenhouse experiments.

Treatment
ethephone0
Outcome
protein concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13 %e0
Qualifier
in one of the two experimentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“chlormequat increased grain protein by 7 to 11 % whereas ethephon increased protein concentration by up to 13 % in one of the two experiments.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1175–1317 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors attribute some grain protein concentration increase to reduced starch deposition associated with reduced yield.

Taxon
Spring Barley and WheatHordeum vulgareTriticum aestivumt0
Outcome
increase in gram protein concentratione0
Qualifier
decreased starch depositione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Spring Barley and Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–86 · show in text ↑
e0

“a portion of the increase in gram protein concentration is due to decreased starch deposition, which is associated with yield reductions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1519–1656 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased protein accumulation in barley grain partly caused the protein concentration increase after plant growth regulator application.

Treatment
PGR applicatione0
Outcome
increase in grain protein concentratione0
Qualifier
increased protein accumulation in the barley graine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greenhouse data confirmed that a portion of the increase in grain protein concentration due to PGR application is caused by increased protein accumulation in the barley grain.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1657–1836 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results differ

31 papers: 22 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

27 papers more in this group

See all 31 papers →

chlormequat chloride · quality: protein · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.