Paper · 1992 · Agronomy Journal

Agronomic and Economic Response of Spring Wheat Cultivars to Ethephon

A. Khan; L. Spilde

9
claims
24
verbatim quotes
18
citations
1
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Abstract Efforts to optimize grain yields in wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.) are often hindered by excessive lodging associated with intensive cereal management systems. The plant growth regulator ethephon [(2‐chloroethyl) phosphonic acid] has been used as an essential component of intensive cereal management systems in Europe to control lodging and maintain high yield potential. The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments. A randomized complete block design in a split plot arrangement with four replicates was used at each of four locations in 1987 and 1988. Main plot treatments consisted of the cultivars Era, Stoa, Len, and Nordic, and split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon). Application of ethephon (280 g a.i. ha −1 ) increased grain yield 5.4% when averaged across environments and cultivars. Generally, ethephon application tended to increase spikes per square meter but had no effect on kernel weight and kernels per spike. Ethephon treatment reduced lodging in 1987. Lodging was absent in 1988. Application of ethephon had a significant positive effect on test weight, but did not influence grain protein concentration and maturity. Economic parameters, net benefit, and marginal rate of return, indicated ethephon could be recommended for cultivars Era, Len, and Stoa, but not for Nordic under environmental conditions similar to those in this study.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon application increased grain yield by 5.4% averaged across environments and cultivars.

Treatment
Application of ethephon (280 g a.i. ha −1 )e1
Outcome
grain yielde1
Direction
increasede1
Value
5.4%e1
Qualifier
averaged across environments and cultivarse1
Comparator
control (no ethephon)e2
Setting
North Dakota environmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e1

“Application of ethephon (280 g a.i. ha −1 ) increased grain yield 5.4% when averaged across environments and cultivars”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 801–919 · show in text ↑
e2

“split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–799 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon tended to increase the number of spikes per square meter.

Treatment
ethephon applicatione3
Outcome
spikes per square metere3
Direction
tended to increasee3
Qualifier
tended to increasee3
Comparator
control (no ethephon)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e2

“split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–799 · show in text ↑
e3

“Generally, ethephon application tended to increase spikes per square meter but had no effect on kernel weight and kernels per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon had no effect on kernel weight and kernels per spike.

Treatment
ethephon applicatione3
Outcome
kernel weight and kernels per spikee3
Direction
had no effecte3
Comparator
control (no ethephon)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e2

“split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–799 · show in text ↑
e3

“Generally, ethephon application tended to increase spikes per square meter but had no effect on kernel weight and kernels per spike”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 921–1052 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon treatment reduced lodging in 1987.

Treatment
Ethephon treatmente4
Outcome
lodginge4
Direction
reducede4
Qualifier
in 1987e4
Comparator
control (no ethephon)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e2

“split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–799 · show in text ↑
e4

“Ethephon treatment reduced lodging in 1987”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1054–1096 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lodging was absent in 1988.

Outcome
Lodging was absente5
Qualifier
in 1988e5

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e5

“Lodging was absent in 1988”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1098–1124 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon application had a significant positive effect on test weight compared with the control.

Treatment
Application of ethephone6
Outcome
test weighte6
Direction
significant positive effecte6
Comparator
control (no ethephon)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e2

“split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–799 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of ethephon had a significant positive effect on test weight, but did not influence grain protein concentration and maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1262 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon did not influence grain protein concentration or maturity.

Treatment
Application of ethephone6
Outcome
grain protein concentration and maturitye6
Direction
did not influencee6
Comparator
control (no ethephon)e2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e2

“split plots were assigned to ethephon and control (no ethephon)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 736–799 · show in text ↑
e6

“Application of ethephon had a significant positive effect on test weight, but did not influence grain protein concentration and maturity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1262 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Net benefit and marginal rate of return indicated that ethephon could be recommended for cultivars Era, Len and Stoa.

Material
cultivars Era, Len, and Stoae7
Outcome
could be recommendede7
Qualifier
under environmental conditions similar to those in this studye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e7

“Economic parameters, net benefit, and marginal rate of return, indicated ethephon could be recommended for cultivars Era, Len, and Stoa, but not for Nordic under environmental conditions similar to those in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1481 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Ethephon should not be recommended for cultivar Nordic under environmental conditions similar to this study.

Material
Nordice7
Outcome
could be recommendede7
Qualifier
under environmental conditions similar to those in this studye7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The objective of this study was to determine the effect of ethephon on four hard red spring wheat cultivars in North Dakota environments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 381–517 · show in text ↑
e7

“Economic parameters, net benefit, and marginal rate of return, indicated ethephon could be recommended for cultivars Era, Len, and Stoa, but not for Nordic under environmental conditions similar to those in this study”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1264–1481 · show in text ↑

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 13 positive, 5 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

21 papers: 15 positive, 6 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

(2-chloroethyl)phosphonic acid · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.