Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The polypropylene woven mulch and double irrigation combination gave a significantly higher seed weight/pod of 0.21 gm.

A claim from Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Productivity under Different Irrigation Frequencies and Mulching · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The polypropylene woven mulch and double irrigation combination gave a significantly higher seed weight/pod of 0.21 gm.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
M1-PPWM and I2-double irrigatione0
Outcome
seed weight/pode0
Direction
highere0
Value
0.21 gme0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Mulching and irrigation frequencies significantly influenced the growth and yield attributes at harvest maximum plant height (77.67 cm), number of primary branches per plant (28.50), number of pod/plant (37.33), seed weight/pod (0.21 gm), and yield/hectare (20.29 q) higher in treatment combination of M1-PPWM and I2-double irrigation i.e. treatment (T5)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 778–1132
t0

“Chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–20

Title

Response of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Productivity under Different Irrigation Frequencies and Mulching

D. Komal; S.R. Bhakar; S.S. Lakhawat; et al. International Journal of Current Microbiology and Applied Sciences 2018. doi:10.20546/ijcmas.2018.709.452

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-70c7d42c0efdc84e40c3d9a265ffa5162e423d578e4467e7835323d5fdc81e7e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this claim · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. negative
  7. negative
  8. no effect

115 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.