Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage gave significantly better yield related traits than deep and zero tillage.

A claim from Sustainable maize production through seed inoculation and different tillage regimes · 2015

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage gave significantly better yield related traits than deep and zero tillage.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillagee0
Outcome
yield related traitse0
Direction
significantly bettere0
Comparator
deep tillagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“yield related traits, grain yield and protein contents were significantly better in conventional tillage followed by deep tillage, while performance of maize sown under zero tillage was poor”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1413–1603
t0

“maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 12–17

Title

Sustainable maize production through seed inoculation and different tillage regimes

Iqbal, Zahid Figshare 2015. doi:10.6084/m9.figshare.1572127.v1

Other claims from this paper (10)

Record rev-710dc3ac1dbbbd0b904456e3134479147046c532047d82676a3a0ae855b5eebd · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

811 papers in the same direction as this claim · 230 in the opposite direction · 57 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.