Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Excised fruits from NAA-sprayed trees lost less 14 C-indoleacetic acid than fruits from unsprayed trees

A claim from Abscission Mechanism Studies With Apple Fruitlets1 · 1978

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Excised fruits from NAA-sprayed trees lost less 14 C-indoleacetic acid than fruits from unsprayed trees

Organ / stage
Excised fruitse2
Treatment
NAA-sprayed treese2
Outcome
14 C-indoleacetic acide2
Direction
lost lesse2
Comparator
unsprayed treese2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“Naphthaleneacetic acid (NAA) applied as a spray to apple ( Malus domestica Borkh.) trees, entire limbs, or foliage only, reduced fruit retention but, when applied to fruit only, retention was unaffected”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 9–211
e2

“Excised fruits from NAA-sprayed trees took up less 14 C-sucrose and lost less 14 C-indoleacetic acid than those from unsprayed trees”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 337–469

Title

Abscission Mechanism Studies With Apple Fruitlets1

G. W. Schneider Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science 1978. doi:10.21273/jashs.103.4.455

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-71318718be9bff1477de736eae0126e4e3b9ac246dcf127afc3251b59c8dde1a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer