Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Water stress did not cause lasting photosynthetic damage after stress removal.

A claim from Photosystem II energy use,non‐photochemical quenching and the xanthophyll cycle in Sorghumbicolor grown under drought and free‐air CO2 enrichment(FACE) conditions · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water stress did not cause lasting photosynthetic damage after stress removal.

Taxon
Sorghum bicolorSorghum bicolore1
Treatment
Water‐stresse0
Outcome
long‐term damage to the photosynthetic apparatuse0
Direction
didnot leade0
Qualifier
measuredafter removal of stress conditionse0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Sorghum bicolor
Sorghum bicolor · TaxonNo machine-readable author provided. Pethan assumed (based on copyright claims). · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Water‐stress didnot lead to long‐term damage to the photosynthetic apparatus asindicated by φ PSII and carbon assimilation measuredafter removal of stress conditions.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1018–1184
e1

“Chlorophyll a fluorescencewas monitored in Sorghum bicolor plants grown under a free‐aircarbon‐dioxide enrichment (FACE) by water‐stress (Dry) experiment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 259–413

Title

Photosystem II energy use,non‐photochemical quenching and the xanthophyll cycle in Sorghumbicolor grown under drought and free‐air CO2 enrichment(FACE) conditions

A. B. Cousins; N. R. Adam; G. W. Wall; et al. Plant Cell & Environment 2002. doi:10.1046/j.1365-3040.2002.00935.x

Other claims from this paper (11)

Record rev-71a7dae5cc7af415aa3ed54fb2a90b09823c8879c29a5adba1e27ce63a934f17 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

drought · physiology: photosynthesis · Sorghum bicolor (sorghum)Results differ

15 papers: 2 positive, 13 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this claim · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. negative
  7. no effect
  8. negative

6 papers more in this group

See all 15 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.