Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Conventional tillage yielded 209 kg ha −1 less than treatment leaving 26% stubble.

A claim from Management Practices to Reduce Gray Leaf Spot of Maize · 1997

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Conventional tillage yielded 209 kg ha −1 less than treatment leaving 26% stubble.

Taxon
MaizeZea mayst0
Treatment
conventional tillage with minimal stubble (3% residue)e0
Outcome
mean yielde0
Direction
lowere0
Value
209 kg ha −1e0
Comparator
tillage treatments leaving 82 and 26% stubblee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean yield of conventional tillage with minimal stubble (3% residue), during four seasons, was between 28 and 209 kg ha −1 lower than tillage treatments leaving 82 and 26% stubble on the soil surface, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1257–1470
t0

“Management Practices to Reduce Gray Leaf Spot of Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–54

Title

Management Practices to Reduce Gray Leaf Spot of Maize

J. M. J. Ward; M. D. Laing; A. L. P. Cairns Crop Science 1997. doi:10.2135/cropsci1997.0011183x003700040038x

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-71cfafa199bb38134b4e5091cb6cd6da20310d47f29b3aecea1eb8fe7e4e2dfb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 811 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.