Intervention effectmodel-written summary

EM plus marigold leaf extract at 20% increased shoot dry weight of non-inoculated tomato by 11% over non-inoculated controls.

A claim from Evaluation of Effective Microorganisms (EM®) against Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) in Tomato · 2021

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

EM plus marigold leaf extract at 20% increased shoot dry weight of non-inoculated tomato by 11% over non-inoculated controls.

Treatment
EM®+ marigold leaf extract at the rate of 20%e1
Outcome
shoot dry weighte1
Direction
increasede1
Value
11e1
Qualifier
non-inoculated plantse1
Comparator
non-inoculated control plantse1
Setting
greenhouse conditionse2

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor role

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“in Tomato”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 95–104
e1

“The treatment with EM®+ marigold leaf extract at the rate of 20% was the most effective treatment and increased shoot length, shoot fresh weight and shoot dry weight of non-inoculated plants by 33, 39 and 11% respectively, as compared to non-inoculated control plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2815–3082
e2

“The pots were kept under greenhouse conditions”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1415

Title

Evaluation of Effective Microorganisms (EM®) against Root-Knot Nematode (Meloidogyne javanica) in Tomato

H. Charehgani; S. Mahdi DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals) 2021. doi:10.22067/jpp.2021.67213.0

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-7204b2f0f7771f645b59e64efdc38c8d420c2c1dae419f2251b3ddecfaa4c86f · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

botanical · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

291 papers: 203 positive, 88 negative or no effect

202 papers in the same direction as this claim · 87 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative
  4. negative
  5. no effect
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. negative

282 papers more in this group

See all 291 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.