Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Seed inoculation and mineral fertilization had significant effects on pea growth, seed yield, protein content and protein yield.

A claim from Effect of Mineral Fertilization and Seed Inoculation with Microbial Preparation on Seed and Protein Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.) · 2024

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Seed inoculation and mineral fertilization had significant effects on pea growth, seed yield, protein content and protein yield.

Taxon
Pisum sativumLathyrus oleraceust0
Treatment
seed inoculation and mineral fertilizatione1
Outcome
seed yield, protein content and protein yielde1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingDirectionValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“The results of the study showed significant effects of seed inoculation and mineral fertilization on pea plant growth and the productivity parameters seed yield, protein content and protein yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 829–1024
t0

“Effect of Mineral Fertilization and Seed Inoculation with Microbial Preparation on Seed and Protein Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–131

Title

Effect of Mineral Fertilization and Seed Inoculation with Microbial Preparation on Seed and Protein Yield of Pea (Pisum sativum L.)

Liudmyla Yeremko; Volodymyr Hanhur; Mariola Staniak Agronomy 2024. doi:10.3390/agronomy14051004

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-732a0e968db7f3fdeda516766acff0ec5b2beb2d93521291b778993879026063 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

fertilization · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

27 papers: 26 positive, 1 negative or no effect

25 papers in the same direction as this claim · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 18 positive, 4 negative or no effect

17 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.