Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Corn grain yield after zone tillage with red clover underseeding was within 1% of conventional tillage (7.23 vs 7.33 Mg/ha).

A claim from Impacts of Zone Tillage and Red Clover on Corn Performance and Soil Physical Quality · 2003

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Corn grain yield after zone tillage with red clover underseeding was within 1% of conventional tillage (7.23 vs 7.33 Mg/ha).

Taxon
Zea maysZea mayse7
Treatment
zone tillage following underseeded RCe1
Outcome
corn grain yieldse1
Direction
no_changeinferrede1
Value
7.23 Mg ha−1e1
Comparator
conventional tillagee1
Setting
Woodslee, ON Canadae6

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“zone tillage following underseeded RC produced average corn grain yields (7.23 Mg ha−1) that were within 1% of those obtained using conventional tillage (7.33 Mg ha−1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1022–1189
e6

“at Woodslee, ON Canada”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 891–913
e7

“reduced corn (Zea mays L.) performance”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 28–66

Title

Impacts of Zone Tillage and Red Clover on Corn Performance and Soil Physical Quality

C. F. Drury; C. S. Tan; W. D. Reynolds; et al. Soil Science Society of America Journal 2003. doi:10.2136/sssaj2003.0867

Other claims from this paper (4)

Record rev-73718992e634ea4eef7007bd812998d9c7424435fcfef43e59c636da7363666a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

tillage · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,099 papers: 812 positive, 287 negative or no effect

287 papers in the same direction as this claim · 811 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

1,090 papers more in this group

See all 1,099 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.