Intervention effectmodel-written summary

FYM with EM gave the highest bean yield parameters, ahead of town refuse, while biogas manure gave the lowest.

A claim from Effect of organic and bio-fertilizer management practices on nutrient availability and uptake by Faba bean-Maize sequence. · 2014

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FYM with EM gave the highest bean yield parameters, ahead of town refuse, while biogas manure gave the lowest.

Taxon
beant0
Treatment
FYM combined with EMe0
Outcome
yield parameterse0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
town refuse applicatione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“Application of FYM combined with EM recorded the highest yield parameters followed town refuse application and the lowest value was recorded in the treatment receiving Biogas manure”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 931–1112
t0

“Faba bean-Maize”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–112

Title

Effect of organic and bio-fertilizer management practices on nutrient availability and uptake by Faba bean-Maize sequence.

Farid Hellal; R. M. Zewainy; Alamisaeid Khalil; et al. AMERICAN-EURASIAN JOURNAL OF SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE 2014

Other claims from this paper (8)

Record rev-74c59bfe6b72d7e2461e1fcbc75e747981a227236b463cb2fd00ddcc77335331 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

inoculation · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

195 papers: 153 positive, 42 negative or no effect

152 papers in the same direction as this claim · 36 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
    Inoculated treatments yielded significantly less than the control.

    Effects of Angular Leaf Spot and Rust on Yield Loss of Phaseolus vulgaris · 2001 · compared with control treatment

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    LCS0306 inoculation gave grain yield similar to nitrogen-fertilised controls.

    Formulation of a Highly Effective Inoculant for Common Bean Based on an Autochthonous Elite Strain of Rhizobium leguminosarum bv. phaseoli, and Genomic-Based Insights Into Its Agronomic Performance · 2019 · compared with nitrogen-fertilised controls

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Under BGYMV inoculation, PR9556-158 had fewer seeds per pod than PR9556-171.

    Inheritance of Normal Pod Development in Bean Golden Yellow Mosaic Resistant Common Bean · 2004 · compared with PR9556-171

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Rhizobia inoculation did not significantly increase seed yields or reduce the response to N fertilizer.

    Fertilizer responses of dry bean in southern Alberta · 2001

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation under full N did not raise biomass or pod yield.

    Impact of rhizobial inoculation and reduced N supply on biomass production and biological N2 fixation in common bean grown hydroponically · 2017 · compared with non‐inoculation

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Inoculated common bean cultivars showed reductions in pod number, grain number, and grain mass.

    Charcoal rot severity and yield components of common bean cultivars inoculated with Macrophomina phaseolina · 2020

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Inoculation had no effect on yield.

    Field Trials with Canadian Wonder Beans in Malawi · 1973

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Inoculation produced no bean yield response at either site.

    Nitrogen application and inoculation with Rhizobium tropici on common bean in the fall/winter · 2014

    Opposite direction

186 papers more in this group

See all 195 papers →

fertilization · yield · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

376 papers: 331 positive, 45 negative or no effect

330 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Standard fertilizer did not increase bean production.

    Associational Susceptibility: Effects of Cropping Pattern and Fertilizer on Malawian Bean Fly Levels · 1995

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Dry bean grain yield at the optimum and adjusted low fertilizer rates was comparable in 2007/08.

    Assessment of maize and dry bean productivity under different intercrop systems and fertilization regimes. · 2010

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Heavy nitrogen fertilization did not increase seed yield.

    Partitioning of nitrogen from biological fixation and fertilizer in Phaseolus vulgaris · 1987

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    PBZ ten days after ammonium sulfate fertilization did not affect bean yield.

    GROWTH AND YIELD OF THE COMMON BEAN IN RESPONSE TO COMBINED APPLICATION OF NITROGEN AND PACLOBUTRAZOL · 2016

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization at any timing did not increase yield components or grain yield.

    Nitrogen management effects on soil mineral nitrogen, plant nutrition and yield of super early cycle common bean genotypes · 2017

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Organic nutrient management reduced french bean yield by 29.5–46.2% relative to integrated nutrient management.

    Effects of Organic Amendments on Productivity and Profitability of Bell Pepper–French Bean–Garden Pea System and on Soil Properties during Transition to Organic Production · 2011 · compared with integrated nutrient management

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Improved fertilization did not have a significant effect on bean yield.

    Factors contributing to maize and bean yield gaps in Central America vary with site and agroecological conditions · 2019

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    N-free nutrient solution restricted total plant biomass and pod yield in common bean compared with the standard solution.

    Responses of Hydroponically Grown Common Bean Fed with Nitrogen-free Nutrient Solution to Root Inoculation with N2-fixing Bacteria · 2015 · compared with standard (100% N) NS

    Opposite direction

367 papers more in this group

See all 376 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.