Intervention effectmodel-written summary

At 600 ppm nanosilicon, PadiU Putra seed germination performance increased significantly over control.

A claim from Bio-efficacy of Nanosilicon in Regulating Oxidative Activity to Control Rice Seedlings Rot Disease Caused by Burkholderia glumae · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 600 ppm nanosilicon, PadiU Putra seed germination performance increased significantly over control.

Material
PadiU Putrae1
Treatment
nanosilicon at 600 ppme0
Outcome
seedling germination performancese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both rice seed varieties primed with nanosilicon at 600 ppm exhibited a significant increase in seedling germination performances over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–855
e1

“rice variety MR297 and PadiU Putra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–566

Title

Bio-efficacy of Nanosilicon in Regulating Oxidative Activity to Control Rice Seedlings Rot Disease Caused by Burkholderia glumae

Tamilselvan R. Govinda Rajoo; Muhamad Syazlie Che Ibrahim; Aziz Ahmad; et al. The Plant Pathology Journal 2025. doi:10.5423/ppj.oa.08.2024.0123

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-752bd6bf896948c846ff6818c59dd4aeef6ab1cda74afeaabd4d6502a740fff8 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 2 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this claim · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. negative
  5. negative
  6. no effect
  7. negative
  8. no effect

135 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.