Paper · 2025 · The Plant Pathology Journal

Bio-efficacy of Nanosilicon in Regulating Oxidative Activity to Control Rice Seedlings Rot Disease Caused by Burkholderia glumae

Tamilselvan R. Govinda Rajoo; Muhamad Syazlie Che Ibrahim; Aziz Ahmad; et al.

6
claims
9
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Bacterial panicle blight and seedling rot diseases in rice plants (Oryza sativa L.) are caused by the pathogenic bacterial Burkholderia glumae. The nanosilicon treatment is gaining attraction but its effectiveness towards B. glumae infection in rice seedlings through regulating enzymatic activities remains largely unexplored. This study aimed to evaluate the bio-efficacy of nanosilicon in controlling seedling rot disease through regulation of peroxidase and polyphenol oxidase enzymes after challenge infected with B. glumae in rice variety MR297 and PadiU Putra. Nanosilicon was applied as seed priming in germination testing at 0, 300, 600, and 900 ppm on both rice varieties before B. glumae inoculation. Both rice seed varieties primed with nanosilicon at 600 ppm exhibited a significant increase in seedling germination performances over control. The rice seedling of MR297 was more responsive to nanosilicon at 600 ppm with only 17.78% of disease severity index over 26.67% in PadiU Putra and was therefore selected for the enzymatic activity screening. The results showed that the foliar spray of nanosilicon rice plants (MR297) significantly increased both peroxidase (POX) at 24 h and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) at 48 h after B. glumae inoculation with 20.44/min/g and 7.46/g activities, respectively. In addition, the plant growth performances were significantly increased compared with control under the same treatment. This demonstrates nanosilicon's potential to control rice seedling rot disease by regulating POX and PPO activities and hence promote plant growth. The application of nanosilicon is an environmentally friendly approach for controlling B. glumae infection at the early rice growing stage.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 600 ppm nanosilicon, MR297 seed germination performance increased significantly over control.

Material
MR297e1
Treatment
nanosilicon at 600 ppme0
Outcome
seedling germination performancese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both rice seed varieties primed with nanosilicon at 600 ppm exhibited a significant increase in seedling germination performances over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice variety MR297 and PadiU Putra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–566 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 600 ppm nanosilicon, PadiU Putra seed germination performance increased significantly over control.

Material
PadiU Putrae1
Treatment
nanosilicon at 600 ppme0
Outcome
seedling germination performancese0
Direction
increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both rice seed varieties primed with nanosilicon at 600 ppm exhibited a significant increase in seedling germination performances over control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 712–855 · show in text ↑
e1

“rice variety MR297 and PadiU Putra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 532–566 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MR297 had a disease severity index of 17.78%, versus 26.67% for PadiU Putra, at 600 ppm nanosilicon.

Material
MR297e0
Treatment
nanosilicon at 600 ppme0
Outcome
disease severity indexe0
Direction
onlye0
Value
17.78%e0
Qualifier
26.67%e0
Comparator
PadiU Putrae0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The rice seedling of MR297 was more responsive to nanosilicon at 600 ppm with only 17.78% of disease severity index over 26.67% in PadiU Putra”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 856–998 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilicon foliar spray significantly increased POX activity at 24 hours after inoculation in MR297.

Material
MR297e0
Treatment
foliar spray of nanosilicone0
Interactor
B. glumaeBurkholderia glumaee0pathogen
Gene
peroxidase (POX)e0
Outcome
peroxidase (POX)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
20.44/min/ge0
Qualifier
24 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia glumae
Burkholderia glumae · InteractorFelipeveraruiz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar spray of nanosilicon rice plants (MR297) significantly increased both peroxidase (POX) at 24 h and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) at 48 h after B. glumae inoculation with 20.44/min/g and 7.46/g activities, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilicon foliar spray significantly increased PPO activity at 48 hours after inoculation in MR297.

Material
MR297e0
Treatment
foliar spray of nanosilicone0
Interactor
B. glumaeBurkholderia glumaee0pathogen
Gene
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Outcome
polyphenol oxidase (PPO)e0
Direction
increasede0
Value
7.46/ge0
Qualifier
48 he0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Burkholderia glumae
Burkholderia glumae · InteractorFelipeveraruiz · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the foliar spray of nanosilicon rice plants (MR297) significantly increased both peroxidase (POX) at 24 h and polyphenol oxidase (PPO) at 48 h after B. glumae inoculation with 20.44/min/g and 7.46/g activities, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1312 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanosilicon significantly increased plant growth performance relative to control.

Material
MR297e1
Treatment
foliar spray of nanosilicone1
Outcome
plant growth performancese0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plant growth performances were significantly increased compared with control under the same treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1326–1432 · show in text ↑
e1

“foliar spray of nanosilicon rice plants (MR297)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1139 · show in text ↑

application · Burkholderia glumae · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

144 papers: 132 positive, 12 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

140 papers more in this group

See all 144 papers →

application · growth · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

313 papers: 274 positive, 39 negative or no effect

273 papers in the same direction as this paper · 36 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

309 papers more in this group

See all 313 papers →

nanoparticle · Burkholderia glumae · Oryza sativa (rice)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.