application · Burkholderia glumae · Oryza sativa (rice)

Positive and negative results6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

11 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.

Papers here report positive and negative or no-effect results. No pair of them has been accepted in the claim-by-claim check.

How these papers cite each other

1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.

Positive resultNegative result or no effect200820102012201420162018202020222024
  • Positive result
  • Negative result or no effect
  • Citation, pointing to the cited paper
  • Citation across the two sides
  • Larger circle: more citations overall

Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.

Papers reporting a positive result 5

  1. Bacillus oryzicola sp. nov., an Endophytic Bacterium Isolated from the Roots of Rice with Antimicrobial, Plant Growth Promoting, and Systemic Resistance Inducing Activities in Rice · 2015

    cited by 1 paper here

  2. Isolation and Characterization of Bacteriophages Infecting Burkholderia glumae, the Major Causal Agent of Bacterial Panicle Blight in Rice · 2021

  3. Applications of bacteriophages in controlling rice bacterial grain rot caused by Burkholderia glumae · 2021

  4. Bio-efficacy of Nanosilicon in Regulating Oxidative Activity to Control Rice Seedlings Rot Disease Caused by Burkholderia glumae · 2025

  5. Advancing the Development of Pseudomonas protegens PBL3 Secretome as a Biopesticide to Control Bacterial Panicle Blight in Rice · 2025

    cites 1 paper here

Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 1

  1. Association of Burkholderia glumae and B. gladioli with Panicle Blight Symptoms on Rice in Panama · 2007

A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.

application on Oryza sativa (rice) against other targets