Claim · model-written summary
Compost favored protein accumulation.
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“Grapevine”
e0“Biochemical analyses indicated that compost favored protein and carotenoid accumulation, while vermicompost increased proline and later protein levels, alongside reduced phenolic and flavonoid contents.”
Title
Carolina Maia; Sandra Pereira; Renata Moura; et al. Plants 2026. doi:10.3390/plants15040558
Other claims from this paper (15)
- Intervention effect Organic amendments enhanced photosynthetic performance compared with an unfertilized control.
- Intervention effect Organic amendments enhanced root growth compared with an unfertilized control.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost promoted higher CO2 assimilation.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost promoted higher stomatal conductance.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost promoted higher shoot and root elongation.
- Intervention effect Compost increased intrinsic water use efficiency.
- Intervention effect Compost increased photochemical regulation.
- Intervention effect Compost increased root biomass.
- Intervention effect Compost favored carotenoid accumulation.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost increased proline levels.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost increased protein levels.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost reduced phenolic contents.
- Intervention effect Vermicompost reduced flavonoid contents.
- Observation Compost and vermicompost induced distinct physiological responses despite similar chemical composition.
- Intervention effect Pruning-derived amendments could match mineral fertilization in supporting grapevine performance.