Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Weed density was lowest (9.93 m−2) under pre-emergence followed by one hand weeding at 40 DAT, compared with no weeding.

A claim from Efficacy and Economics of Different Weed Control Practices in boro Rice under High Ganges River Floodplain of Bangladesh · 2022

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Weed density was lowest (9.93 m−2) under pre-emergence followed by one hand weeding at 40 DAT, compared with no weeding.

Taxon
boro ricee1
Treatment
pre-emergence fb one HW at 40 DATe0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
weed densitye0
Direction
loweste0
Value
9.93 m−2e0
Comparator
no weeding conditione0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The highest weed density (98.22 m−2 ) and dry weight (51.36 g m−2 ) were found in no weeding condition but that of the lowest value (weed density: 9.93 m−2 and dry weight: 3.59 g m−2 ) was observed in pre-emergence fb one HW at 40 DAT”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 973–1207
e1

“appropriate weed management practices in boro rice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 266–316

Title

Efficacy and Economics of Different Weed Control Practices in boro Rice under High Ganges River Floodplain of Bangladesh

Monira S; Ali MI; Sarker UK; et al. Journal of Agriculture Food and Environment 2022. doi:10.47440/jafe.2022.3307

Other claims from this paper (16)

Record rev-775bfbcecb2da2586a29a38883d5aaeb20a974b0f25cb34e073c326d18b8c58a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 1 in the model’s answer

herbicide · weed · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

603 papers: 579 positive, 24 negative or no effect

578 papers in the same direction as this claim · 17 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. negative
  8. no effect

594 papers more in this group

See all 603 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.