Claim · model-written summary
Corn grain yield varied among hybrids and locations with environmental differences.
- Taxon
- corn
Zea mays subsp. mayse1 - Material
- hybridse0
- Outcome
- Grain yielde0
- Setting
- locationse0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorDirectionValueQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Grain yield was variable between hybrids and locations due to environmental differences”
t0“Crops”
e1“The examined GR corn densities had a significant effect on cotton yield”
Title
Walter E. Thomas NCSU Libraries Repository (North Carolina State University Libraries) 2006
Other claims from this paper (19)
- Observation Weed control did not differ significantly between corn hybrid systems.
- Observation Net returns varied for each hybrid system within a location.
- Intervention effect Glyphosate-resistant corn density significantly affected cotton yield.
- Observation Leaves above the treated leaf and roots were the greatest sinks for labeled glyphosate regardless of corn stage.
- Observation Reproductive corn tissues may accumulate more labeled glyphosate, especially following treatment after V6.
- Observation Cotton glyphosate absorption increased over time.
- Observation Glyphosate absorption at the eight-leaf stage did not differ between cotton events.
- Observation Cotton glyphosate translocation patterns did not differ between events or harvest times.
- Observation Cotton glyphosate translocation showed a source-sink relationship.
- Observation Glyphosate and sucrose export patterns from the treated cotton leaf were similar.
- Intervention effect Mepiquat chloride treatments caused no significant difference in cotton height, leaf area or specific leaf weight.
- Intervention effect MC treated cotton had greater dry weight in first-position fruit at nodes 1 to 3 than untreated plants.
- Intervention effect No significant effect on cotton labeled glyphosate translocation was found in the MC study.
- Intervention effect MC and MP reduced cotton height and nodes per plant.
- Intervention effect Cotton fruit retention was not influenced by growth-regulator treatment.
- Intervention effect MC and MP did not influence labeled glyphosate translocation in cotton.
- Recommendation An eight-hour rain-free period was needed to maximize cotton growth-regulator efficacy.
- Observation Cyclanilide absorption ranged from 11% at 3 hours to 15% at 48 hours after treatment.
- Observation On average, 18% of cyclanilide remained in the treated cotton leaf.