Claim · model-written summary
Red LED lighting consumed 75.6% less electric energy than fluorescent control.
- Taxon
- lettuce
Lactuca sativat0 - Treatment
- red LEDe0
- Outcome
- accumulated electric energy consumptione0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 75.6%e0
- Comparator
- controle1
Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingQualifier
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“the accumulated electric energy consumption decreased by 75.6% for red LED”
t0“Lettuce”
e1“Cool-white fluorescent lamps (FL) were used as the control”
Title
Hye In Lee; Yong Hyeon Kim 바이오시스템공학(구 한국농업기계학회지) 2013
Other claims from this paper (12)
- Intervention effect Blue LED lighting consumed 70.7% less electric energy than fluorescent control.
- Intervention effect Accumulated photosynthetically active radiation decreased 43.8% under red LED versus control.
- Intervention effect Accumulated photosynthetically active radiation decreased 33.5% under blue LED versus control.
- Observation At growth stage 2, lettuce electric energy utilization efficiency was 1.29-2.06% under red LED.
- Observation At growth stage 2, lettuce electric energy utilization efficiency was 0.76-1.53% under blue LED.
- Observation At growth stage 2, lettuce electric energy utilization efficiency was 0.25-0.41% under fluorescent lamps.
- Observation Lettuce radiation utilization efficiency was 6.25-9.95% under red LED.
- Observation Lettuce radiation utilization efficiency was 3.75-7.49% under blue LED.
- Observation Lettuce radiation utilization efficiency was 2.77-4.62% under fluorescent lamps.
- Association Longer light periods significantly increased electric energy utilization efficiency.
- Association Longer light periods significantly increased radiation utilization efficiency.
- Recommendation The authors recommend 16-20 h of daily illumination to improve lettuce light utilization efficiency.