Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Treatment T8 was at par with T9 for plant height, tillers per metre row length and dry matter accumulation in barley.

A claim from Influence of integrated nutrient management on growth dynamics and developmental stages of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.) · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatment T8 was at par with T9 for plant height, tillers per metre row length and dry matter accumulation in barley.

Treatment
75% RDF + Azotobacter (Seed treatment) + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha (T8)e1
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers per metre row length and dry matter accumulation (g/m2)e0
Direction
at pare1
Comparator
100% RDF + Azotobacter (Seed treatment) + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha (T9)e0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Hordeum vulgare
Hordeum vulgare · TaxonJackyM59 · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–118
e0

“significantly higher plant height, number of tillers per metre row length and dry matter accumulation (g/m2) with the soil application of 100% RDF + Azotobacter (Seed treatment) + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha (T9)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1102
e1

“it was at par with 75% RDF + Azotobacter (Seed treatment) + Vermicompost @ 2.5 t/ha (T8) and 100% RDF-60 N + 30 P₂O₅ kg/ha (T2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1107–1234

Title

Influence of integrated nutrient management on growth dynamics and developmental stages of barley (Hordeum vulgare L.)

Samir Khan; Yasir Ajeej Tamboli; Ajeet Singh; et al. International Journal of Research in Agronomy 2025. doi:10.33545/2618060x.2025.v8.i10e.3997

Other claims from this paper (5)

Record rev-79ef49bac2b5d4266890c1bc8e9d9c1be3372edf605eb8a03c923722d4ffd235 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

Azotobacter · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Results agree

19 papers: 19 positive, 0 negative or no effect

18 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

seed treatment · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

49 papers: 43 positive, 6 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this claim · 42 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

40 papers more in this group

See all 49 papers →

fertilization · yield · Hordeum vulgare (barley)Positive and negative results

550 papers: 473 positive, 77 negative or no effect

77 papers in the same direction as this claim · 472 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

541 papers more in this group

See all 550 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.