Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Pulse drip irrigation reduced the negative effects of irrigation water salinity on green bean yield.

A claim from Yield of green beans subjected to continuous and pulse drip irrigation with saline water · 2018

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Pulse drip irrigation reduced the negative effects of irrigation water salinity on green bean yield.

Taxon
green beanst0
Treatment
pulse drip irrigatione4
Outcome
negative effects of irrigation water salinity on green bean yielde4
Direction
reducede4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Verbatim

t0

“Yield of green beans subjected to continuous and pulse drip irrigation with saline water”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–88
e4

“pulse drip irrigation reduced the negative effects of irrigation water salinity on green bean yield and increased water use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1059–1193

Title

Yield of green beans subjected to continuous and pulse drip irrigation with saline water

Willian F. de Almeida; Vital P. da S. Paz; Ana P. C. de Jesus; et al. Revista Brasileira de Engenharia Agrícola e Ambiental 2018. doi:10.1590/1807-1929/agriambi.v22n7p476-481

Other claims from this paper (3)

Record rev-7a0d170dfbb2e6e097e6d511dca2524271834fe937d9e823680c3aec99808446 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 3 in the model’s answer

irrigation · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 23 positive, 7 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this claim · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
    Supplying the highest water amount (120% and 100%) decreased water use efficiency.

    INFLUENCE OF USING SOME SAFETY MATERIALS ON WATER REQUIREMENT AND WATER USE EFFICIENCY OF SNAP BEAN PLANT · 2014

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Saline irrigation water reduced chlorophyll, membrane stability and relative water content in snap bean.

    Brassinosteroids or proline can alleviate yield inhibition under salt stress via modulating physio-biochemical activities and antioxidant systems in snap bean · 2022 · compared with 0.0

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Deficit irrigation reduced bean leaf water potential 30 days after application.

    Identifying Bioactive Compounds in Common Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Plants under Water Deficit Conditions · 2024

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Lower irrigation rates decreased total bean evapotranspiration by 7% to 23% on average.

    Evapotranspiration of Common Beans (Phaseolus Vulgaris) Depending on the Irrigation Regime · 2022

    Opposite direction

  5. negative
    Increasing the irrigation interval from 2 to 8 days increased the leaf water deficit of snap bean.

    EFFECT OF IRRIGATION INTERVALS AND SOME ANTITRANSPIRANTS ON GROWTH AND YIELD OF SNAP BEAN (PHASEOLUS VULGARIS L) UNDER DRIP IRRIGATION SYSTEM IN CLAY LOAM SOIL · 2018 · compared with 2 days

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    Furrow irrigated pods lost more water during storage.

    Biochemical and Anatomical Characters of Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) Pods under Furrow and Drip Irrigation System at Harvest and during Postharvest · 2016 · compared with drip-irrigated

    Opposite direction

  7. negative
    Saline irrigation decreased plant water consumption and water use efficiency.

    Ameliorating effects of foliar potassium silicate application on dry beans under salinity stress · 2026

    Opposite direction

  8. positive
    Normal watering raised crop water use efficiency by 13% over traditional management.

    Deficit irrigation at different growth stages of the common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L., cv. Imbabello) · 1997 · compared with traditional management practice

    Same direction

21 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.