Abstract
The biochemical and anatomical analysis of furrow and drip-irrigated pods at harvest and after postharvestwere investigated. Results showed that, furrow-irrigated pods were significantly higher in the concentration of vitaminC, free phenolics, protein and proline as well as superoxide dismutase activity than drip-irrigated ones. On the otherhand, concentration of free amino acids and activity of catalase were higher in drip-irrigated pods by about 4 and 1.7times than furrow-irrigated ones, respectively. Both types of pods were similar in chlorophylls, carotenoids, TA (%),TSS and reducing sugars concentrations. The two pod types were similar in the anatomical parameters studied exceptthat furrow-irrigated pods which showed an increase in the thickness of parenchymatous cells in the pericarp. Duringstorage, furrow-irrigated pods stored at 7±1°C and 85% RH for 25d showed lower % of decay, rot, soggy andshriveling, but showed more water loss than drip-irrigated ones at all storage periods. Drip-irrigated pods maintainedhigh concentration of chlorophylls and carotenoid than furrow-irrigated pods until 20 d of storage. Furrow-irrigatedpods preserve the vitamin C at high concentration at all storage periods. TA (%) and TSS were increased with storage inboth fruit types without any significant differences between them. Both pod types had the same trend in theconcentration of organic compounds and the activity of antioxidative enzymes. Furrow-irrigated pods maintained theirpericarp and symmetric of cells compared to drip-irrigated ones. It could conclude that furrow irrigation was better toproduce visual appearance, high nutritional snap beans with high quality. It can be stored without deleterious effect for25 d at 7±1°C and 85% RH than drip irrigation.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 19
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigated pods had higher vitamin C, free phenolics, and protein concentrations.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)
Phaseolus vulgarist0 - Treatment
- furrow-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- concentration of vitaminC, free phenolics, proteine0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- drip-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow-irrigated pods were significantly higher in the concentration of vitaminC, free phenolics, protein and proline as well as superoxide dismutase activity than drip-irrigated ones.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigated pods had higher proline and superoxide dismutase activity.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- furrow-irrigatede0
- Gene
- superoxide dismutasee0
- Outcome
- proline as well as superoxide dismutase activitye0
- Direction
- highere0
- Comparator
- drip-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow-irrigated pods were significantly higher in the concentration of vitaminC, free phenolics, protein and proline as well as superoxide dismutase activity than drip-irrigated ones.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigated pods had about four times the free amino acid concentration of furrow irrigated pods.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- drip-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- concentration of free amino acidse0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4e0
- Comparator
- furrow-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“concentration of free amino acids and activity of catalase were higher in drip-irrigated pods by about 4 and 1.7times than furrow-irrigated ones, respectively.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigated pods had about 1.7 times the catalase activity of furrow irrigated pods.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- drip-irrigatede0
- Gene
- catalasee0
- Outcome
- activity of catalasee0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.7timese0
- Comparator
- furrow-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“concentration of free amino acids and activity of catalase were higher in drip-irrigated pods by about 4 and 1.7times than furrow-irrigated ones, respectively.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The two irrigation groups had similar chlorophyll, carotenoid, and titratable acidity concentrations.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Both types of podse0
- Outcome
- chlorophylls, carotenoids, TA (%)e0
- Direction
- similare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both types of pods were similar in chlorophylls, carotenoids, TA (%),TSS and reducing sugars concentrations.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The two pod groups had similar soluble solids and reducing sugar concentrations.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Both types of podse0
- Outcome
- TSS and reducing sugars concentrationse0
- Direction
- similare0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both types of pods were similar in chlorophylls, carotenoids, TA (%),TSS and reducing sugars concentrations.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Anatomical parameters were similar between irrigation groups except pericarp parenchyma thickness.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Outcome
- anatomical parameters studiede0
- Direction
- similare0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The two pod types were similar in the anatomical parameters studied exceptthat furrow-irrigated pods which showed an increase in the thickness of parenchymatous cells in the pericarp.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigated pods had thicker pericarp parenchymatous cells.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- furrow-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- thickness of parenchymatous cells in the pericarpe0
- Direction
- increasee0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow-irrigated pods which showed an increase in the thickness of parenchymatous cells in the pericarp.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
During storage, furrow irrigated pods had less decay, rot, and sogginess.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- furrow-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- % of decay, rot, soggye0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Qualifier
- stored at 7±1°C and 85% RH for 25de0
- Comparator
- drip-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow-irrigated pods stored at 7±1°C and 85% RH for 25d showed lower % of decay, rot, soggy andshriveling, but showed more water loss than drip-irrigated ones at all storage periods.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
During storage, furrow irrigated pods had less shriveling.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- furrow-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- shrivelinge0
- Direction
- lowere0
- Comparator
- drip-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow-irrigated pods stored at 7±1°C and 85% RH for 25d showed lower % of decay, rot, soggy andshriveling, but showed more water loss than drip-irrigated ones at all storage periods.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigated pods lost more water during storage.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- furrow-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- water losse0
- Direction
- moree0
- Comparator
- drip-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow-irrigated pods stored at 7±1°C and 85% RH for 25d showed lower % of decay, rot, soggy andshriveling, but showed more water loss than drip-irrigated ones at all storage periods.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Drip irrigated pods retained more chlorophyll and carotenoids through 20 days of storage.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Drip-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- concentration of chlorophylls and carotenoide0
- Direction
- highe0
- Qualifier
- until 20 d of storagee0
- Comparator
- furrow-irrigatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Drip-irrigated pods maintainedhigh concentration of chlorophylls and carotenoid than furrow-irrigated pods until 20 d of storage.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigated pods retained high vitamin C throughout storage.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Furrow-irrigatedpodse0
- Outcome
- vitamin Ce0
- Direction
- highe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furrow-irrigatedpods preserve the vitamin C at high concentration at all storage periods.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Titratable acidity and soluble solids rose with storage for both pod types.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Outcome
- TA (%) and TSSe0
- Direction
- increasede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TA (%) and TSS were increased with storage inboth fruit types without any significant differences between them.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The irrigation groups did not differ significantly in acidity or soluble solids during storage.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Outcome
- TA (%) and TSSe0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“TA (%) and TSS were increased with storage inboth fruit types without any significant differences between them.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The two pod types followed the same trend in organic compounds and antioxidant enzymes.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Outcome
- concentration of organic compounds and the activity of antioxidative enzymese0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Both pod types had the same trend in theconcentration of organic compounds and the activity of antioxidative enzymes.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Furrow irrigated pods maintained pericarp and cell symmetry better than drip irrigated pods.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- Furrow-irrigatede0
- Outcome
- pericarp and symmetric of cellse0
- Comparator
- drip-irrigatede0
Not reportedDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“Furrow-irrigated pods maintained theirpericarp and symmetric of cells compared to drip-irrigated ones.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors recommend furrow irrigation for attractive, nutritious, high quality snap beans.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Treatment
- furrow irrigatione0
- Outcome
- visual appearance, high nutritional snap beans with high qualitye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“furrow irrigation was better toproduce visual appearance, high nutritional snap beans with high quality.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors conclude that furrow irrigated snap beans can be stored for 25 days at 7±1°C and 85% RH.
- Taxon
- Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)Phaseolus vulgarist0
- Outcome
- stored without deleterious effecte0
- Qualifier
- 25 d at 7±1°C and 85% RHe0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“It can be stored without deleterious effect for25 d at 7±1°C and 85% RH than drip irrigation.”
t0“Snap Bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · quality: protein · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
irrigation · disease · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- negative
- positive
- positive
irrigation · physiology: pigments · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →irrigation · physiology: water · Phaseolus vulgaris (common bean)Positive and negative results
6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
26 papers more in this group
See all 30 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.