Intervention effectmodel-written summary

sugarcane yield loss loss.

A claim from Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin · 2002

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

sugarcane yield loss loss.

Taxon
sugarcanee0
Treatment
drop of the water table to more than 2 me0
Outcome
yield losse0
Direction
losse0
Value
6%e0
Comparator
1–2 me0
Setting
FESSe1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleQualifier

Verbatim

e0

“The extent of yield loss as result of a rise in the water table from 1–2 m to less than 1 m was 27 and 33% for wheat and sugarcane crops, whereas it was 7 and 6% in the case of a drop of the water table to more than 2 m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 597–816
e1

“Fordwah Eastern Sadiqia South (FESS)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 171–207

Title

Individual and combined effect of waterlogging and salinity on crop yields in the Indus basin

Muhammad Akram Kahlown; Muhammad Azam Irrigation and Drainage 2002. doi:10.1002/ird.62

Other claims from this paper (14)

Record rev-7a5a02c25ef3fc7ef62460b3c9fd55dca415cdcd1bf790e5f929685689d1bed7 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 4 in the model’s answer

soil water · yield · Saccharum officinarum (sugarcane)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 5 positive, 4 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this claim · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. no effect
  7. no effect
  8. negative
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.