Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Cutting one third of the bunch gave the lowest yield of 39.00 kg/plant.

A claim from EFFECT OF COVERYE AND DIFFERENT METHODS OF THINNING ON THE SAME QUALITATIVE AND THE QUANTITATIVETRAITS DATE PALM FRUITS BARHEE AND BREEM CV. · 2016

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutting one third of the bunch gave the lowest yield of 39.00 kg/plant.

Taxon
date palmPhoenix dactyliferat0
Treatment
cutting 1/3 the bunche0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
loweste0
Value
39.00 kg/plante0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Phoenix dactylifera
Phoenix dactylifera · TaxonEJ Burns · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the method of thinning which included cutting 1/3 the bunch gave the lowest yield 39.00 kg/plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 939–1035
t0

“EFFECT OF COVERYE AND DIFFERENT METHODS OF THINNING ON THE SAME QUALITATIVE AND THE QUANTITATIVETRAITS DATE PALM FRUITS BARHEE AND BREEM CV.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–140

Title

EFFECT OF COVERYE AND DIFFERENT METHODS OF THINNING ON THE SAME QUALITATIVE AND THE QUANTITATIVETRAITS DATE PALM FRUITS BARHEE AND BREEM CV.

Faroon A. Hussain Iraqi Journal of Desert Studies 2016. doi:10.36531/ijds.2016.123443

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-7b2aff0a2c593e13087610f3a701e14dbd5f7ff71fb7caa761ac6b9a5a9c0371 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

pruning · yield · Phoenix dactylifera (date palm)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 9 positive, 8 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this claim · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.