Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Nano-AL 0.6% gave strawberries the highest ascorbic acid content, 85 mg per 100 g FW, about 4.25 times that of the control.

A claim from Effect of nanocellulose-based edible coatings enriched with α-pinene and myrtle essential oil on the postharvest quality of strawberry · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano-AL 0.6% gave strawberries the highest ascorbic acid content, 85 mg per 100 g FW, about 4.25 times that of the control.

Taxon
strawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
Nano-AL 0.6%e4
Outcome
ascorbic acid contente4
Direction
higheste4
Value
85 mg. 100 g -1 FWe4
Qualifier
about 4.25 times greatere4
Comparator
controle4

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSetting

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“postharvest quality of strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 101–134
e4

“Nano-AL 0.6% exhibited the highest ascorbic acid content (85 mg. 100 g -1 FW), which was about 4.25 times greater than that of the control (20 mg. 100 g -1 FW)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 920–1079

Title

Effect of nanocellulose-based edible coatings enriched with α-pinene and myrtle essential oil on the postharvest quality of strawberry

Somayeh Karimi Dehbakri; Abdollah Ehtesham Nia; Hasan Mumivand; et al. BMC Plant Biology 2025. doi:10.1186/s12870-025-06757-7

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-7b41ddb4beeae4fb17ab60457536afd4e71d2b2f319c4e3ee0756ba4c8295612 · schema claims-v0.9 · position 6 in the model’s answer

nanoparticle · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

16 papers: 16 positive, 0 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this claim

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
  4. positive
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.