Claim · model-written summary
The tested growth regulator infusions and soaks did not shorten emergence time.
- Taxon
- Freesia hybridae0
- Material
- ‘Moya’e0
- Treatment
- Vacuum infusion or soakinge0
- Outcome
- time required for shoot emergencee0
- Direction
- did not decreasee0
- Qualifier
- in solutions of ethephon, gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), abscisic acid (ABA), benzylamino purine (BA) or indoie-acetic acid (I A A), or in solutions with combinations of these growth regulatorse0
Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValue
Verbatim
e0“Vacuum infusion or soaking of freshly harvested Freesia hybrida Bailey ‘Moya’ corms in solutions of ethephon, gibberellic acid (GA 3 ), abscisic acid (ABA), benzylamino purine (BA) or indoie-acetic acid (I A A), or in solutions with combinations of these growth regulators, did not decrease the time required for shoot emergence.”
Title
Response of Freesia hybrida Corms to Exogenous Growth Regulator Applications1
T. L. Gilbertson-Ferriss; H. F. Wilkins HortScience 1981. doi:10.21273/hortsci.16.4.568
Other claims from this paper (7)
- Intervention effect Ethephon delayed shoot emergence.
- Intervention effect Ethephon combined with GA 3 synergistically further delayed emergence.
- Intervention effect Ethephon combined with GA 3 and BA synergistically further delayed emergence.
- Intervention effect Ethephon increased shoot number per corm.
- Intervention effect Ethephon plus B A increased shoot number per corm.
- Intervention effect Growth regulator treatments did not affect flowering time or flower quality.
- Recommendation The authors see little horticultural advantage in using these regulators to replace the dormancy-removing storage treatment.