Recommendationmodel-written summary

The authors see little horticultural advantage in using these regulators to replace the dormancy-removing storage treatment.

A claim from Response of Freesia hybrida Corms to Exogenous Growth Regulator Applications1 · 1981

Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultnegativebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors see little horticultural advantage in using these regulators to replace the dormancy-removing storage treatment.

Taxon
freesiaFreesiae0
Outcome
applying these growth regulators to freesia corms to hasten shoot emergence prior to plantinge0
Qualifier
little horticultural advantagee0

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleTreatmentComparatorSettingDirectionValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Freesia
Freesia · Taxon · picture of the genus (one of its species)Alvesgaspar · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Presently, there appears to be little horticultural advantage in applying these growth regulators to freesia corms to hasten shoot emergence prior to planting in order to circumvent the need for 10 to 13 week storage treatment at 28°C to remove dormancy and to ensure rapid shoot emergence.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 674–964

Title

Response of Freesia hybrida Corms to Exogenous Growth Regulator Applications1

T. L. Gilbertson-Ferriss; H. F. Wilkins HortScience 1981. doi:10.21273/hortsci.16.4.568

Other claims from this paper (7)

Record rev-d3db8172f1e637abc6de0189daf5a1610ed9616eb99f653622a9209328ccdb8e · schema claims-v0.9 · position 8 in the model’s answer