Intervention effectmodel-written summary

Higher phosphorus doses tended to increase crude protein for Tarchalska.

A claim from Influence of phosphorus nutrition on seed yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars across different seasons · 2019

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Higher phosphorus doses tended to increase crude protein for Tarchalska.

Material
‘Tarchalska’e0
Treatment
higher phosphorus dosese0
Outcome
crude proteine0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedGeneCompoundOrgan / stageInteractorInteractor roleSecond interactorSecond interactor roleComparatorSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lathyrus oleraceus
Lathyrus oleraceus · TaxonRenee Comet (photographer) AV Number: AV-9400-4164 · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Interaction of pea cultivars with fertilisation shows a consistent tendency towards increase of crude protein under higher phosphorus doses for cultivars ‘Tarchalska’ and ‘Protecta’ whereas opposite tendency was observed for ‘Batuta’ and ‘Tinker’.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1385–1632

Title

Influence of phosphorus nutrition on seed yield and quality of pea (Pisum sativum L.) cultivars across different seasons

Agnieszka Klimek-Kopyra; Josef Hakl; Jiri Skladanka; et al. Italian Journal of Agronomy 2019. doi:10.4081/ija.2019.1411

Other claims from this paper (12)

Record rev-7c6df2ae8d4ce6bc47927d78448d07649df256b2c15581eaf1a7b1fca1e131bb · schema claims-v0.9 · position 9 in the model’s answer

phosphorus · quality: protein · Lathyrus oleraceus (pea)Results differ

9 papers: 6 positive, 3 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this claim · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect
  4. no effect
  5. positive
  6. positive
  7. positive
  8. positive
See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.